President Obama Sends 30K Troops to Afghanistan

by Taft Babbitt on December 2, 2009

 

The President has decided to send more troops to Afghanistan. Like most Americans, I have been conflicted about what to do with Afghanistan. I have no doubt that our armed forces are doing good in that country. The question I have is, to what end? The Presidents speech didn’t help clarify that for me. Here are my concerns:

  1. If your going to escalate the effort why not send the full 40K troops the generals requested? I don’t like doing war with a minimalist approach. That was Rumsfeld's doctrine and I don’t buy it.
  2. If we are going to escalate, what is the mission? This was not clear from the speech. Hold off the Taliban. Till when? Prop up the corrupt government till they are stronger. With what assurances of civil rights (particularly for women)? To influence or stabilize or inspire Pakistan to fight it’s Al Qaeda and Taliban elements. That sounds elusive.
  3. I am sick of hearing about exit plans. When it comes to war, either we have objectives and we will do whatever it takes to achieve them or we shouldn’t be at war. The only exit strategy being discussed should be victory or defeat.
Bookmark and Share

The Iranian Missile Crisis

by Taft Babbitt on October 1, 2009

 

The media is underplaying the nuclear missile crisis which has been developing for years and continues to develop every day. In recent days Iran, the country who has publicly stated they seek the complete destruction of Israel, has been discovered to have additional nuclear weapons facilities, conducted missile tests, and some intelligence agencies believe they are assembling their first nuclear warhead. Not only is this a clear and present danger to Israel but to the region as a whole. As if this were not enough, we have a former security advisor to Jimmy Carter saying that if Israel preemptively attacks the nuclear facilities in Iran that the United States should shoot down the Israeli planes! This is madness! Oh! If we could have only killed Hitler before the death of six million Jews. How many lives did Neville Chamberlain save by his appeasement of Hitler?

Chamberlain became Prime Minister of Great Britain when Stanley Baldwin resigned in 1937, and soon became known for its policy of appeasement. He let it be widely known that he thought that Germany had been badly treated after the World War I, and that by agreeing to some of Germany's demands, he could atone for this, and hoped to avoid a repeat of the slaughter so recently visited on Europe. This policy was vocally opposed by Chamberlains Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden, who resigned in protest in February 1938, to be replaced by Lord Halifax.

Soon afterward Hitler unified Germany and Austria, an act expressly forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles, and Chamberlain came under fire from Eden and Churchill to take action. The result was a four way meeting between Britain, France, Germany and Italy in September 1938. Here an agreement known as The Munich Pact was reached, saying that Britain and Germany would never go to war with one another again. This outcome was hugely popular with the British public, and Chamberlain returned to the country a hero and was acclaimed as the man who had saved the world from war, when he stepped of the plane waving that famous piece of paper he said 'I believe it is peace in our time.'

Israel is a peace seeking, liberty loving, ally and they deserve our full support in protecting their lives and their liberty! The President should make it clear to the world that we are behind Israel. We should give Iran an ultimatum that they let U.N. weapons inspectors in with no restrictions or face the consequences of a full Naval blockade to enforce complete sanctions on Iran. And if Israel feels the need to take out the nuclear facilities via air strikes they should have our support.

Bookmark and Share

Nation Building

by Taft Babbitt on September 17, 2009

 

What is Nation Building? I would define Nation Building as: establishing the foundational infrastructure, policies and laws, processes, organizations, and human resources that would allow a nation to exist and continue to function after the Nation Building efforts have concluded. When is Nation Building needed? I would answer that Nation Building is needed whenever there is an significantly large population that exists in a common geography which lacks a central government and there is significant general suffering of the people. Who can perform Nation Building? In today's world I would answer, no one.

Read More...

Categories: Foreign Affairs