Simply put the human race is divided into two groups, the decent and the indecent. The distinction has nothing to do with race, religion, sex, or age. It has everything to do with values. It is easy to believe that because we have a certain racial heritage or cultural background, or because we are men or women, or because we subscribe to a specific religion or none at all that we act, understand, and react the way we do. However all these distinctions are cosmetic, they only create a context in which values are defined and held by us as individuals. It is the actual values that these environments advocate, either knowingly or unknowingly, that form the soul of the man or woman that then acts upon the world through the filter of these values.

If a society has taught men that women are their property then they see no value in a woman being able to choose her own profession. If a culture has fostered the creative nature of the individual then they see value in the creations a person can imagine and build. Not all values are equal. Values roll up into two supreme values: the value of Good and the value of Evil. Values of Good are anything that increases or builds up the good things of the world and Evil is anything that destroys or reduces the good things of the world. The more good a value produces, the greater that value.

Do we know what we value? Many people are so busy in life that they do not take the time to thoughtfully reflect on their values. As a result many people believe that they hold values that in fact they do not. They give lip service to it in conversation but indeed their hearts are far from those values. Take the simple example of anger vs. patience. Most would assert that they hold the value of patience higher than anger and feel that one should have patience in most circumstances and resort to anger only when the need is important. The examples of people getting angry over unimportant things are legion; the problem of road rage alone is convincing.

Spend some time paying attention to where you spend your time and how you behave while executing your daily tasks. If watched closely enough you will see the things you value and the values you actually hold and those you cast aside. The observation could result in a revelation that may begin a personal transformation.

The great American virtue of liberty is dying and the healers are drunk with apathy. In 1776, our founders proclaimed liberty the primary American virtue. This declaration brought with it unlimited potential and unlimited responsibility for every American. All the achievements of mankind have depended upon one essential condition: liberty, a condition in which one has the power to act without confinement, servitude, or control. It has been, and will continue to be, through liberty that the creative power of the human mind is unleashed by experimentation and entrepreneurship. Today liberty is dying. New laws, ordinances, and regulations conjured up by politicians are eroding our foundation of liberty under the illusion of good intentions. Encroachment or degradation of liberty leads to the stagnation of the people because it robs them of their ability to learn through agency and experience. If unchecked, this stagnation grows into, at minimum, dependence upon the state and at worst, slavery. Few scenarios justify this forfeiture of liberty. Scenarios requiring the encroachment of the liberty of the people demand serious thought and vigorous debate before liberty is sacrificed. There are two justifications for this sacrifice: the protection of the liberty of the people as a whole, and the protection of an individual’s liberty. In America today, our lawmakers disregard these limits; they find innumerable ways to reach into our lives and rob us of the inalienable right of liberty.

First, let’s clarify the two cases in which liberty may be appropriately infringed. Liberty of the individual may be temporarily restricted when the liberty of the people as a whole is at risk and protection from imminent threat is required. When threatened in this way, mechanisms for the rescinding of these encroachments must be put into place to ensure the liberty of the people, as the proper state, is respected and restored. A clear example of this occurred during WWII for our national defense. President Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Services Act of 1940 which drafted citizens into our military forces, an encroachment of individual liberty. This action was justifiable because of the clear and present danger of Germany and Japan to the survival of our nation and its people. The act had important restraining provisions including the limiting of service to 12 months and the conscientious objection clause. While some may debate whether these provisions went far enough, they are an acknowledgement that even in times of national emergency all aspects of liberty may not be wholly discarded and that time limits on encroachments of liberty are proper.

More...